There’s sure been large amount of decent technology born from military tech, possibly it’s bad that people haven’t achieved such incredible technological breakthroughs with no actual war component. Okay so, let us discuss this as it were and be prepared for this from historic and philosophical perspective we could?
If a person takes time to see Giulo Douhet’s book “The Command from the Air” – that is still available with the College of Alabama Press printed in ’09, ISBN: 978–8173-5608-8 – a re-printed from Giulio Douhet’s 1929 work – they will immediate see from his diary of ideas from his focus on the battlefield the military technology of human conflict is alive and well, not just in his day – but additionally within our more contemporary era. Indeed, there’s still more in the future.
At the base of page 26 the writer talks to the way forward for war technology like a “constant evolution” on the graph, and almost appears to talk of the inflection-point concept in which the cosign wave or military technology drops completely and starts again with a brand new paradigm because of the ability of aircraft to maneuver no matter terrain inside a 3D space. Remember aircraft had just arrived at the battlefield in the day and altered the face area of war forever.
Okay so Let me find out question from the military planners, proper thinkers, and visionaries of war technology today:
A.) Does that graph incorporate a de-escalation of war, for example using the cold-war, or perhaps a time later on when there’s no war?
B.) It ought to, should not it?
In other words maybe there is the next time when human wars disappear. In my opinion so, I really do. The reason why you ask? Well, due to the fact logically and essentially they just do not seem sensible. Why subject your civilization to future wars, causing destruction, and trouble of the population simply to obtain that number of folks rise within the next generation to supply their idea of a appropriate reciprocal response? Observe that point.
Just like the war game scenarios of MAD – Mutual Assured Destruction determined that the nuclear exchange was unthinkable there could be no champion, you could ask can there be ever a champion in wartime? Really, a obvious victory, no, not necessarily, and victory does not appear to last forever. Thus, what this informs use is that frequently the best choice would be to not play.